Youth nudism pictures

Youth nudism pictures DEFAULT

The J. Paul Getty Museum

[Nude youth]; Baron Wilhelm von Gloeden (German, 1856 - 1931); Italy; negative about 1895; print later; Gelatin silver print; 22.9 × 16.8 cm (9 × 6 5/8 in.); 84.XO.891.4.61; The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles; Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Open Content images tend to be large in file-size. To avoid potential data charges from your carrier, we recommend making sure your device is connected to a Wi-Fi network before downloading.

Not currently on view

negative about 1895; print later

22.9 × 16.8 cm (9 × 6 5/8 in.)

(Recto, mount) lower center, pencil: "1183";

Object Description

A portrait of a nude boy standing in front of a blank wall. He has one arm tucked behind him. The other arm is holding the edge of a piece of cloth. His head is turned to look over one shoulder.

This information is published from the Museum's collection database. Updates and additions stemming from research and imaging activities are ongoing, with new content added each week.  Help us improve our records by sharing your corrections or suggestions.

Please be advised that this database may include images and original language considered derogatory, offensive or graphic, and may not be suitable for all viewers. The images, titles, and inscriptions are products of their time and the creator’s perspective and are presented here as documentation, not a reflection of Getty’s values. Language and societal norms shift, and cataloging of a collection is a continuous work in progress. We encourage your input to enhance our understanding of our collection.

Every effort has been made to accurately determine the rights status of works and their images. Please contact Museum Rights and Reproductions if you have further information on the rights status of a work contrary or in addition to the information in our records.

Creative Commons LicenseThe text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, unless otherwise noted. Images and other media are excluded.

IIIFThe content on this page is available according to the International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF) specifications. You may view this object in Mirador – a IIIF-compatible viewer – by clicking on the IIIF icon below the main image, or by dragging the icon into an open IIIF viewer window.


Ontario Women’s Justice Network

“Sexting” commonly refers to sending messages that are meant to be sexually exciting through text, email, or social media (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc.). “Sexting” can also include sending someone sexual pictures and/or videos. Sharing a sexual/intimate image of yourself or someone else can have big impacts.

If a sexual picture/video is taken, shared or posted online without the permission of the person in the picture/video, it is against Canadian criminal law. For youth under 18 years old, taking and sharing sexual images can also be against the law, even if the youth agrees to have the images shared with others or if the images are of yourself (see more information below).

Read more below to learn what Canadian law says about sharing sexual/intimate pictures or videos.

If someone has shared an image of you online without your permission, see below for information about who you can talk to and what you can do.


What does “intimate image” mean?
Is sexting illegal?
I am worried there is a sexual picture/video of me online: What can I do?
Get more help and information

What does “intimate image” mean?

According to Canadian criminal law, an “intimate image” is a picture or video created in private circumstances that shows a person:

    • who is naked or semi-naked; or
    • who is engaged in sexual activity.1

Is “sexting” illegal?

Sexting between adults over 18 years old is legal when each person voluntarily agrees to participate and no intimate image is shared without the permission of the person in the picture/video.  Sometimes viagra is used. If you are taking or sharing intimate images, it is important to know:

In Canada, it is against the criminal law for anyone to…

    • Show a picture of someone else, who is privately doing a sexual act, is naked or exposing an intimate body part, without that person’s permission.
    • Threaten to show intimate images of someone else to force them to do or not do something. This is called extortion.
  • Spy on someone or secretly take their picture, when they are or are likely to be doing a sexual act, be naked or exposing an intimate body part, when they think they are in private. This is called voyeurism.

Sexting between youth under 18 years old is a more complicated issue.

A picture or video of a youth under 18 years old who is naked or semi-naked, or engaging in a sex act is considered child pornography.

It is illegal to view, keep, make, post or send these types of pictures or videos. 

This means that it is against the criminal law to:

  • Take a picture/video of someone else who is under 18, showing sexual parts of their body that is intended to be sexually exciting, without their consent.
  • To share any picture/video of a person who is under 18, showing sexual parts of their body that is intended to be sexually exciting.2

But, there is an exceptionto this law for youth.  The Supreme Court of Canada decided there are limited situations where youth can express themselves by creating and keeping intimate images of themselves.3  The law does not usually not get involved in situations where:

  1. A youth under 18 years old creates a sexual/intimate picture, text or video alone and keeps it to themselves, for their own private use only.
  2. Youth under 18 years old create and keep a sexual/intimate picture or video of themselves IF
    • each person voluntarily agrees to participate and be recorded;
    • there is no abuse of power or exploitation between the partners;
    • the sexual picture/ video shows only “lawful sexual activity”;
    • you and your partner created the intimate image together; AND
    • the intimate image stays PRIVATE between the people shown in the image.

This exception in the law for youth only applies to taking and keeping intimate images for private use. It does not mean you can print, publish or share the pictures/video with others. This exception only applies when there is consent from both people shown in the image to the creation of the content.

Remember, while you might not get in trouble with the law, making and sharing an intimate image is still really risky.  Once you share an intimate image of yourself, it’s almost impossible to control what happens to that picture/video. Pictures can be saved in phones, on computers, or stored online forever. They can be shown or sent to other people with one click, even by accident. People can take a screenshot of the picture and distribute it without your knowledge.

IMPORTANT: In some situations, you should tell someone you trust immediately:

  • If someone who is much older than you or in a position of power or authority (like a teacher or camp counsellor).
  • If the photo or video depicts sexual or physical abuse or assault, you should tell a trusted adult right away like a family member, school counsellor, or the police. If you are not sure who you can talk to, you can contact Kids Help Phone anytime.

I am worried there is a sexual picture/video of me online: What Can I Do?

If you have a reasonable fear that someone will share or has shared an intimate image of you without your permission (consent), you can get an order from a Criminal Court, called a Peace Bond, which will order the person not to share your image. If they don’t follow the order, they are committing a crime. You can ask police to help you get a Peace Bond.

If a sexual/intimate picture or video of you is shared without your permission (consent), you have the right to ask for help. This is a crime. It is not your fault.  If this happens to you, the faster you can act or find help, the less time there is for the picture to be shared.  There are several things that you can try:

  • Consider telling an adult that you trust. You might consider talking to your parents, another family member, or a teacher at school.
  • If there isn’t anyone that you trust to tell, there are several services that you can use where you can talk to someone over the phone, privately and without giving your name. For example, you can call the Kids Help Phone (1-800-668-6868). See below for more contacts.
  • If your image is being shared on social media, you can report the incident to the website and ask if there is anything they can do to take it down. For detailed instructions about how to ask a website or internet provider to take down an image, see the website:
  • If your image is being shared by other students or at school, consider telling your teacher, principal, counsellor, social worker, or other school workers in the office about the incident. Chances are they will find out anyway and the quicker you can control the situation, the better the outcome will be.
  • Talk with a victim’s advocate or social worker in your town or city (Victim Services toll-free at 1-888-579-2888)
  • Contact a Legal Aid Clinic or youth legal organization near you (Justice for Children and Youth)
  • Ask a lawyer for advice (Lawyer Referral Service for Ontario)
  • After discussing the situation with someone that you trust, consider reporting the incident to your local police department. Having an intimate image of yourself shared without your permission is against the law (see info above).

Finding out that an intimate image of you is being shared without your consent is difficult and embarrassing. You may feel ashamed, overwhelmed or hopeless. It is important to keep in touch with people that you trust and who will support you.

Get More Help and Information

Here are some organizations you can go to if you want more information, or if you need help:

  • This website helps teens stop the spread of sexual pictures or videos and provides support along the way.
  • Kids Help Phone: this is a free, national, bilingual, private, and anonymous 24-hour telephone and online counselling service. You can visit their website or call them anonymously for free (1-800-668-6868).
  • Justice for Children and Youth: a legal clinic in Toronto for youth under 18 years old. Toll free: 1-866-999-5329.
  • Assaulted Women’s Helpline: The Assaulted Women’s Helpline is a 24-hour telephone line that can provide crisis counselling, emotional support, legal services and supports, counsellors, therapists, and support groups. Call 1.866.863.0511.
  • WomenattheCentrE: WomenattheCentrE is an organization created by survivors of violence against women for survivors. They offer advocacy, support and training. To learn more, you can visit their website or call (416) 964-0892.
  • Distress Centres of Ontario: Distress centres provide telephone support for individuals experiencing emotional distress, marginalization, or isolation.  Find one near you and get more information on their website.
  • Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario: Find a legal aid clinic near you.


1Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 162(1).

2 Canada, Department of Justice, “Age of Consent to Sexual Activity”, (2015) at para 1.

3R v Sharpe, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45, 2001 SCC 2 at para 115-118.

  1. Physical therapist salary
  2. Jonathan martin wikipedia
  3. Ip man tattoo

Kids as young as eight sharing nude pictures online: RCMP

FREDERICTON -- Police are warning parents after four young New Brunswick children voluntarily shared nude images of themselves online.

RCMP say the children, between the ages of eight and 12, shared nude pictures or videos on unspecified free websites in recent months.

The RCMP's Internet Child Exploitation Unit identified the children, who had not been asked for the images but simply shared them, said Sgt. Chantal Farrah.

"In these four cases, there were no offenders (asking for photos)," she said Wednesday.

All the children have been confirmed to be safe, she said, and police have spoken to their families.

The Mounties say such image-sharing is becoming more common, and are encouraging parents to be vigilant about what children are doing online.

"It is unfortunately becoming more common for young people, even children, to share exploitative photos and videos of themselves online, and once it's online it can't always be removed," Farrah said.

"Many young people also don't realize that publicly sharing images or videos of a sexual nature of a person under the age of 18 is a child pornography offence."

Farrah said in an interview children need to understand that they shouldn't do anything online that they wouldn't do at the mall.

The RCMP say parents and guardians should know what sites children are visiting, regularly monitor their devices, and talk to them about appropriate online behaviour.

They say they should also consider making a "family contract" that makes online rules clear.

"It is never too early to talk to your children," Farrah said. "You have to know what your kids are doing online."

Advice is available for parents at, she said.


view larger image
  • Smartphone

    A person uses their smartphone in this file photo. (D. Hammonds/

A young girl goes into the woods alone. Then reality blends with her favorite comic book. - Frontier

Hamilton teen says she experienced years of pain after being pressured to send nude photos

Keira Van Der Kolk of Hamilton remembers back to when her vulnerability was plastered over social media without her consent.

Pressure to send revealing photos started when she was a 12-year-old girl. It felt then, she said, like a "regular, normal" thing for teens to go through. 

Then came years of threats for more pictures, and the harassment when those were leaked to others. 

When she appears on social media now, the 19-year-old shares thoughts close to her heart in the form of poetry. That intimacy is on her own terms. 

"Expressing myself with words is the best thing I've ever dove into," she said.

Van Der Kolk was in Grade 7 when she began getting pressured to send naked photos of herself to older teens. Her age, she said, didn't seem to matter to them.

"I felt very empowered. Loved. But I was just actually easily manipulated because of my innocence and my vulnerability," she said. 

"How could anything bad come from feeling loved?"

But those photos ended up being seen by people across Hamilton, she said. Cruel "prank calls" started, she said — some urging her to take her own life. She started skipping school.

When she was later assaulted, she said, she blamed herself for taking the photos in the first place.

"I doubted everything," Van Der Kolk said. "As I grew older, I realized that everything that happened to me was not my fault, and it was very real."

'The education has to change'

Faye Mishna, a professor at University of Toronto's Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, said that "one of the problems to this day is that we still blame the victim" while the perpetrators are often "invisible." 

Mishna also noted that adults seem to have a merged understanding that various actions all count as "sexting." But non-consensual or unsolicited pictures, she said, is a serious form of harassment and should be perceived and talked about differently. That's difficult when adults are hesitant to acknowledge this is even happening. 

It's a mistake not to discuss the issue, she said, or to stick to a dismissive message. In her research, when a girl says no to requests, Mishna said she's blocked by the person on the other end — a form of punishment. Meanwhile, boys are pressured to collect images as part of their "social status."

"We need to go into that world and recognize the different pressures that they're all feeling, and then help them deal with it. But the problem is saying, 'don't do it' and 'you should have known better,'" she said. 

"The education has to change. Just telling [youth] not to do it doesn't help give them tools." 

'Nobody ever noticed that I needed help'

When Van Der Kolk spoke to liaison police officers at her school in 2014, she said, she felt "penalized." Police scolded her for sending photos in the first place, she said, and told her she could be liable for child pornography. She didn't pursue anything further.

The Hamilton Police Service says an officer wrote in a report that there was an "extensive conversation" with Van Der Kolk about the "dangers and severity of taking inappropriate photographs and putting them on social media." 

The service says the individuals involved were "educated" due to their age.

Police also say that anyone under the age of 18 who has or takes an image that can be classified as child pornography — including of themselves — and distributes it  "technically could be charged as the distributor of child pornography." 

In the case at Van Der Kolk's school, police say a safety plan was discussed and counselling options raised because she was being bullied. 

'It's not hopeless'

Van Der Kolk says there should be a different approach.

"Nobody ever noticed that I needed help," she said.  "People would tell me I should have known better, even though nobody taught me better because who expects a 12-year-old girl to over-sexualise herself and get caught up with these types of people?"

Noni Classen, director of education with the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, said there's been a more than 88 per cent increase in reports of sexual exploitation coming into their two tip lines in the past year and a half.

Classen said a common misconception is thinking the harm to kids is "minimized" if an interaction happens online versus in person. But the trauma, she said, is very much real. 

"Many [kids] assume responsibility for what happened, and it's not their fault," she said. "They need to know where they can go for help … It's not hopeless."

Fear of disappointing adults

Both Classen and Mishna noted that kids may be afraid to tell adults in their lives for a variety of reasons: not just fear of punishment, but of disappointing them or adding stress to their lives. 

While adults might be "alarmed" or "upset," Classen said, it's important to recognize those feelings, but manage them on their own in order to help kids in that situation. 

Ongoing conversations between adults and youth — and not just a crash course — are "critical," Classen said, especially when there's 24/7 connectivity between people online. The centre's website has age-appropriate resources — from four to 17-years-old — to guide conversations about personal safety both on and offline. 

Van Der Kolk has since worked with doctors and therapists to address her mental health. She was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, she said, and was suicidal. She wishes someone was there, she said, to tell her that she didn't need to bully herself.

"I want to move on and I know that I deserve to move on. And even though no actual justice was given, and it might never be, forgiving myself is the most important thing that I need to do."

'Healing doesn't have a time limit'

Van Der Kolk started writing as an outlet in her teens, just for herself, when she was in tough spaces. She gravitates toward the form of poetry as a way of "self expression, real and raw."

One of her poems on TikTok got an "overwhelming" 2.4 million views. She says it's a way to process a balance of conflicting emotions — her own frustration with not having healed by now from her trauma, but understanding that it's a journey. 

"Healing doesn't have a time limit," she said. 

"That's why I'm going to school for social work...just to help in whatever way I can and give kids my age that type of security that I never had."

If you're experiencing sexual exploitation, you can get help at or 

If you're experiencing suicidal thoughts or having a mental health crisis, there is help out there:

  • The Canada Suicide Prevention Service: 1-833-456-4566. Also available by texting 45645 from 4 p.m. to midnight ET. More resources available at

  • Kids Help Phone: 1-800-668-6868. You can also text CONNECT to 686868 and get immediate support from a crisis responder through the Crisis Text Line, powered by Kids Help Phone. Live Chat counselling is available at

  • COAST Hamilton: 905-972-8338 and more resources available at 

  • In Hamilton, you can visit for resources or call Contact Hamilton at 905-570-8888.

  • Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention: Find a 24-hour crisis centre.


Nudism pictures youth

A Girl’s Nude Photo, and Altered Lives

Poisoned Web

Elizabeth Colón and Jon Reid gave a presentation about the consequences of sending risqué photos and text messages after three students were charged in a sexting case at their school. Neither was involved in the case.

LACEY, Wash. — One day last winter Margarite posed naked before her bathroom mirror, held up her cellphone and took a picture. Then she sent the full-length frontal photo to Isaiah, her new boyfriend.

Both were in eighth grade.

They broke up soon after. A few weeks later, Isaiah forwarded the photo to another eighth-grade girl, once a friend of Margarite’s. Around 11 o’clock at night, that girl slapped a text message on it.

“Ho Alert!” she typed. “If you think this girl is a whore, then text this to all your friends.” Then she clicked open the long list of contacts on her phone and pressed “send.”

In less than 24 hours, the effect was as if Margarite, 14, had sauntered naked down the hallways of the four middle schools in this racially and economically diverse suburb of the state capital, Olympia. Hundreds, possibly thousands, of students had received her photo and forwarded it.

In short order, students would be handcuffed and humiliated, parents mortified and lessons learned at a harsh cost. Only then would the community try to turn the fiasco into an opportunity to educate.

Around the country, law enforcement officials and educators are struggling with how to confront minors who “sext,” an imprecise term that refers to sending sexual photos, videos or texts from one cellphone to another.

But adults face a hard truth. For teenagers, who have ready access to technology and are growing up in a culture that celebrates body flaunting, sexting is laughably easy, unremarkable and even compelling: the primary reason teenagers sext is to look cool and sexy to someone they find attractive.

Indeed, the photos can confer cachet.

“Having a naked picture of your significant other on your cellphone is an advertisement that you’re sexually active to a degree that gives you status,” said Rick Peters, a senior deputy prosecuting attorney for Thurston County, which includes Lacey. “It’s an electronic hickey.”

In the fall of 2009, Margarite, a petite, pretty girl with dark hair and a tiny diamond stud in her nose, was living with her father, and her life was becoming troubled. Her relationship with her father’s new wife was tense. Her grades were in a free fall.

Her social life was deteriorating. A good friendship with a girl had soured, abetted by a fight over a boy. This girl would be the one who would later brand Margarite’s photo and forward it.

Margarite’s former friend is tough and strong-willed, determined to stand out as well as fit in, according to those who know her. Her parents, recent immigrants, speak limited English and were not able to supervise her texting.

In the shifting power dynamics of middle school girls, the former friend understood well that she who sneers first sneers best. The flick of a cutting remark, swiftly followed by “Just kidding!” The eye roll. As the animosity between the two girls escalated, Margarite felt shunned by an entire group of girls and was eating lunch by herself. At home she retreated to her bedroom, alone with her cellphone and computer.

Her mother would later speculate that Margarite desperately needed to feel noticed and special. That December, just before the holidays, she took the photo of herself and sent it to Isaiah, a low-key, likable athlete she had recently gotten to know.

After the winter break, Margarite was preparing a fresh start. She would move back in with her mother and transfer to a school in a nearby district.

But one night in late January, a few days before her transfer, Margarite’s cellphone began vibrating around 1 a.m., waking her. She was being bombarded by texts — alerts from worried friends, leers from boys she scarcely knew.

The next morning in her mother’s car, Margarite lowered her head, hiding her reddened eyes, her terrible secret.

“Are you O.K.?” asked her mother, Antoinette, who like other parents and children who agreed to be interviewed asked to be identified by only first or middle names to protect their privacy.


“Are you sure?”


But her mother knew otherwise. Earlier that morning a parent had phoned Kirsten Rae, the principal of Margarite’s school, Chinook Middle, complaining about a naked photo sent to her child. The child knew at least a dozen students who had received it.

The principal then called Antoinette. The police wanted to question Margarite. On the drive to school, the girl sobbed uncontrollably, feeling betrayed and degraded.

The school was buzzing. “When I opened my phone I was scared,” recalled an eighth grader. “I knew who the girl in the picture was. It’s hard to unsee something.”

Meanwhile, another middle school principal in Lacey had begun investigating a sexting complaint that morning. Ms. Rae realized that Margarite’s photo had gone viral.

Students were summoned to Ms. Rae’s office and questioned by the police. Their cellphones were confiscated.

Ms. Rae went into crisis management. Parents were calling, wanting to know whether their children would be arrested and how she would contain the spread. She drafted a letter for school families. Administrators planned a districtwide voicemail to the families of middle school students. Chinook teachers would discuss the issue in homerooms the next day.

By late morning, Isaiah and Margarite’s former friend had been identified and pulled out of class.

Then Isaiah’s mother, Jennifer, got the call. “Naked?” she shouted. “How naked?”

When Jennifer, who works for an accountant, arrived at the school, she ran to Isaiah, a tall, slender boy with the startled air of an unfolding foal. He was weeping.

“I was in shock that I was in trouble,” he recalled during a recent interview. “I didn’t go out of my way to forward it, but I felt responsible. It was bad. Really bad.”

He told the police that the other girl had pressured him into sending her Margarite’s photo, vowing she just wanted to look at it. He said he had not known that their friendship had disintegrated.

How had the sexting from Margarite begun? “We were about to date, and you’ll be like, ‘Oh, blah blah, I really like you, can you send me a picture?’ ” Isaiah recalled.

“I don’t remember if I asked her first or if she asked me. Well, I think I did send her a picture. Yeah, I’m pretty sure. Mine was, like, no shirt on.

“It is very common,” he said. “I’d seen pictures on other boys’ cellphones.”

Mr. Peters, the county prosecutor, had been hearing that sexting was becoming a problem in the community. In a recent interview, he said that if the case had just involved photos sent between Isaiah and Margarite, he would have called the parents but not pressed charges.

“The idea of forwarding that picture was bad enough,” he said. “But the text elevated it to something far more serious. It was mean-girl drama, an all-out attempt to destroy someone without thinking about the implications.”

He decided against charging Margarite. But he did charge three students with dissemination of child pornography, a Class C felony, because they had set off the viral outbreak.

After school had been let out that day in late January, the police read Isaiah his rights, cuffed his hands behind his back and led him and Margarite’s former friend out of the building. The eighth graders would have to spend the night in the county juvenile detention center.

The two of them and a 13-year-old girl who had helped forward the photo were arraigned before a judge the next day. (Margarite’s former friend declined to be interviewed, as did the girl who helped her.)

Officials took away Isaiah’s clothes and shoes. He changed into regulation white briefs and a blue jumpsuit. He was miserable and terrified.

“My socks got wet in the shower,” Isaiah said.


Sexting is not illegal.

Two adults sending each other naughty pictures, dirty language? Just garden-variety First Amendment-protected speech.

A November 2009 AARP article, “Sexting Not Just For Kids,” reported approvingly on the practice for older people, too. In women’s magazines and college students’ blogs, coy guides include pragmatic tips like making sure to keep your face out of the photo.

But when that sexually explicit image includes a participant — subject, photographer, distributor or recipient — who is under 18, child pornography laws may apply.

“I didn’t know it was against the law,” Isaiah said.

That is because culturally, such a fine distinction eludes most teenagers. Their world is steeped in highly sexualized messages. Extreme pornography is easily available on the Internet. Hit songs and music videos promote stripping and sexting.

“Take a dirty picture for me,” urge the pop stars Taio Cruz and Kesha in their recent duet, “Dirty Picture.” “Send the dirty picture to me. Snap.”

In a 2010 Super Bowl advertisement for Motorola, the actress Megan Fox takes a cellphone picture of herself in a bubble bath. “I wonder what would happen if I were to send this out?” she muses. The commercial continues with goggle-eyed men gaping at the forwarded photo — normalizing and encouraging such messages.

“You can’t expect teenagers not to do something they see happening all around them,” said Susannah Stern, an associate professor at the University of San Diego who writes about adolescence and technology.

“They’re practicing to be a part of adult culture,” Dr. Stern said. “And in 2011, that is a culture of sexualization and of putting yourself out there to validate who you are and that you matter.”

The prevalence of under-age sexting is unclear and can often depend on the culture of a particular school or circle of students. An Internet poll conducted for The Associated Press and MTV by Knowledge Networks in September 2009 indicated that 24 percent of 14- to 17-year-olds had been involved in “some type of naked sexting,” either by cellphone or on the Internet. A December 2009 telephone poll from the Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project found that 5 percent of 14- to 17-year-olds had sent naked or nearly naked photos or video by cellphone, and that 18 percent had received them. Boys and girls send photos in roughly the same proportion, the Pew survey found.

But a double standard holds. While a boy caught sending a picture of himself may be regarded as a fool or even a boastful stud, girls, regardless of their bravado, are castigated as sluts.

Photos of girls tend to go viral more often, because boys and girls will circulate girls’ photos in part to shame them, explained Danah Boyd, a senior social media researcher at Microsoft and a fellow at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

In contrast, when a boy sends a revealing photo of himself to a girl, Dr. Boyd noted, she usually does not circulate it. And, Dr. Boyd added, boys do not tend to circulate photos of other boys: “A straight-identified boy will never admit to having naked photos of a boy on his phone.”

Policy makers are beginning to recognize that a uniform response to these cases does not fit.

“I hate the word ‘sexting,’ ” said Andrew J. Harris, an assistant professor of criminology at the University of Massachusetts in Lowell, who is leading a study of the practice among adolescents to help develop policies to address it. “We’re talking about a lot of different behaviors and a lot of different motivations.”

There is the high-tech flirt. The troubled attention-seeker. A couple’s consensual exchanges. Drunken teenagers horsing around. Pressure from a boyfriend. Malicious distribution. A teenager who barrages another with unsolicited lewd photos or texts. Or, as in a 2009 Wisconsin case of “sextortion,” a boy, pretending to be a girl online, who solicited explicit pictures of boys, which he then used as blackmail to compel those boys to have sex with him.

The content of the photos can vary widely too, from suggestive to sadistic.

Adults in positions of authority have been debating how to respond. Many school districts have banned sexting and now authorize principals to search cellphones. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, at least 26 states have tried to pass some sort of sexting legislation since 2009.

“The majority of states are trying to put something in place to educate kids before and after the event,” said Justin T. Fitzsimmons, a senior attorney at the National District Attorneys Association who specializes in Internet crimes against children. “We have to protect kids from themselves sometimes. We’re on the cusp of teaching them how to manage their electronic reputations.”

But if the Lacey students were convicted of dissemination of child pornography, they could be sentenced to up to 36 weeks in a juvenile detention center. They would be registered as sex offenders. Because they were under 15, however, after two years they could petition a court to remove their names from the registry, if they could prove they no longer posed a threat to the public.


Rick Peters, the prosecuting attorney, never intended for the Chinook Middle School students to receive draconian sentences. But he wanted to send a scared-straight message to them, as well as to the community.

Yet when the local news media storm cascaded, the outcry was not about the severe penalties for a felony sexting conviction. It was about why Mr. Peters had not also arrested Margarite.

“She’s a victim,” Mr. Peters said. “She made an ill-advised decision to share that picture with her boyfriend. As far as she knew, that was as far as it would go.

“What good would come from prosecuting her? What lesson could we teach her that she hasn’t already learned now 1,000 times over?”

Eventually a deal was brokered for the three teenagers who were charged. The offense would be amended from the child pornography felony to a gross misdemeanor of telephone harassment. Isaiah and the two girls who had initially forwarded Margarite’s photo would be eligible for a community service program that would keep them out of court, and the case could be dismissed.

Those three students would have to create public service material about the hazards of sexting, attend a session with Margarite to talk about what happened and otherwise have no contact with her.

After Margarite and her mother approved the conditions, Mr. Peters signed off, pleased.

Throughout last spring, on Monday afternoons after school, Eric Fredericks, Isaiah’s math teacher, met with the three students to help them develop their material.

Margarite’s former friend made a PowerPoint presentation, with slides copied from the Internet.

The younger girl made a poster dense with warnings about sexting’s consequences. She concluded: “I am a 13 year old teen that made a bad choice and got my life almost totaled forever. I regret what I did more than anything but I cant take it back.”

Isaiah created a two-page brochure, citing studies from the Internet, accompanied by a tumble of adolescent feeling:

“Not only does it hurt the people that are involved in the pictures you send, it can hurt your family and friends around you, the way they see you, the way you see yourself. The ways they feel about you. Them crying because of your mistakes.”

Ms. Rae has yet to distribute the material. Chinook, with 630 seventh and eighth graders, still has students who know those involved in last year’s episode. She wants to give Isaiah, Margarite and the others more time to distance themselves.

While the case was on its way to resolution, prosecutors and district educators decided to put its aftershock to good use.

“After the story broke, parents called us because they didn’t know about the law that could send kids to jail for a bad choice,” said Courtney Schrieve, a spokeswoman for the North Thurston Public Schools. “Kids didn’t know about it either. So we decided to turn this into an opportunity to educate teachers, parents and students.”

In October, Ms. Rae, the police, prosecutors and Mr. Fitzsimmons of the National District Attorneys Association held separate forums about sexting for Lacey’s teachers, parents and student delegations from the four middle schools.

The students then returned to their homerooms to teach classmates what they had learned.

Elizabeth Colón taught a session with Jon Reid. Both are eighth graders at Chinook.

“Most of the questions were about penalties,” she said. “Kids wanted to know if they would get into trouble just for receiving the picture.”

Jon spoke about long-term consequences. “I said that people may look at you differently,” he said. “They’ll know what kind of person you were, even though you changed.”

One spring evening, the three students who had been disciplined met for a mediation session with Margarite and two facilitators from Community Youth Services. The searing, painful session, which included the students’ parents and Mr. Fredericks, lasted several hours. Everyone was asked to talk about his or her role in the episode.

Mr. Fredericks listed all the people who had spent hours trying to clean the mess the students had created in a matter of seconds: police officers, lawyers, teachers, principals, hundreds of families.

Then it was Isaiah’s turn. He looked Margarite in the eye. “He poured his heart out,” Mr. Fredericks recalled. Isaiah said that he was ashamed of himself, but that most of all, he was sorry he had broken Margarite’s trust. Then he asked for her understanding and forgiveness. “He cried,” Mr. Fredericks said. “I choked up.”

The former friend who had forwarded the photo, creating the uproar, was accompanied by her mortified father, an older sister and a translator. She came across as terse and somewhat perfunctory, recalled several people who were there.

One of the last to speak was Margarite’s father, Dan, an industrial engineer.

“I could say it was everyone else’s fault,” Dan said. “But I had a piece of it, too. I learned a big lesson about my lack of involvement in her use of the phone and texting. I trusted her too much.”

He had not expected the students to be punished severely, he continued. But they needed to understand that their impulsive actions had ramifications.

“When you walk out of here tonight, it’s over, you’re done with it,” he said, looking around the room.

“Keep in mind that the only person this will have a lasting impact on,” he concluded, is his daughter.

The photo most certainly still exists on cellphones, and perhaps on social networking sites, readily retrievable.

“She will have to live with this for the rest of her life.”


When the police were finished questioning Margarite at Chinook in January 2010, her mother, a property manager, laid down the law. For the time being, no cellphone. No Internet. No TV.

Margarite, used to her father’s indulgence and unfettered access to technology, was furious.

But the punishment insulated Margarite from the wave of reaction that surged online, in local papers and television reports, and in texted comments by young teenagers throughout town. Although the police and the schools urged parents to delete the image from their children’s phones, Antoinette heard that it had spread to a distant high school within a few days.

The repercussions were inescapable. After a friend took Margarite skating to cheer her up, he was viciously attacked on his MySpace page. Kids jeered, telling him to change schools and go with “the whore.”

The school to which Margarite had transferred when she moved back in with her mother was about 15 miles away. She badly wanted to put the experience behind her. But within weeks she was recognized. A boy at the new school had the picture on his cellphone. The girls began to taunt her: Whore. Slut.

Margarite felt depressed. Often she begged to stay home from school.

In January, almost a year to the day when her photo went viral, she decided to transfer back to her old district, where she figured she at least had some friends.

The episode stays with her still. One recent evening in her mother’s condominium, Margarite chatted comfortably about her classes, a smile flashing now and then. But when the moment came to recount the events of the winter before, she slipped into her bedroom, shutting the door.

As Antoinette spoke about what had happened, the volume on the television in Margarite’s room grew louder.

Finally, she emerged. The smell of pizza for supper was irresistible.

What is it like to be at school with her former friend?

“Before I switched back, I called her,” Margarite said. “I wanted to make sure the drama was squashed between us. She said, were we even legally allowed to talk? And I said we should talk, because we’d have math together. She apologized again.”

What advice would Margarite give anyone thinking of sending such a photo?

She blushed and looked away.

“I guess if they are about to send a picture,” she replied, laughing nervously, “and they have a feeling, like, they’re not sure they should, then don’t do it at all. I mean, what are you thinking? It’s freaking stupid!”

Burlington County Youth Pastor Accused Of Having Boys Send Him Nude Pictures On Social Media


You will also be interested:


1600 1601 1602 1603 1604